![]() ![]() Still no joy.Tony uses his vast resources and intellect to make the world a better place as the invincible Iron Man. I even went onto github and added this key to the list of SSH keys. The dialog box has pre-populated the Private Key File with the id_rsa I dropped into the. I get the "Provide Credentials for authenticating to the SSH Server '' as user 'git'. I enter the git name (based on the link I get from the github repo. Still no sign of any credentials in SmartGit. I gave them silly names to begin with but after some reading renamed them to *id_rsa* and "id_rsa.pub" and dropped them into my Eventually I downloaded PuttyGen and created a pair of keys. I would have assumed there would be something populating the Known Credentials area? I tried in vain in see if I had some key-pair stored somewhere that SmartGit could use. Under Hosting Providers I have added my github account and Clicking on 'Login at GitHub.' it opens the browser and I am logged in successfully. I have selected to use SmartGit as SSH Client. ![]() SmartGit -> Preferences -> Authentication SmartGit works fine locally but I'd like to push to a remote repo on GitHub. Yesterday I installed SmartGit on my Windows 7 PC. I have a public GitHub account for the last year or so. To make it short, I think that SmartGit and SourceTree have made different visualisation choices, and they shine in different situations. But I think the aim is to make targeted navigation easier, which I need more often than a "general picture" examination. On big graphs with a lot of branches selected for viewing, this can be confusing compared to SourceTree's neater graph. By contrast, SourceTree has only two modes: either all branches, of the current branch (so to visualize one branch history you have to make it current, which is often not necessary).Īlso, one of SmartGit's choice that makes sense to me is to limit the overall width of history lines to the left, and use navigation arrows that you can click on to follow a specific history line. In this mode, SmartGit visualisation shines over SourceTree (to my taste, of course this is very subjective) - together with the ability to check only what branches you're interested in the branches panel. My personal preference in SmartGit is to check the "first-parent" option, which renders a linear history, with all merge commits showing a little "+" icon that you can dynamically expand to explore the history that you choose. I think SmartGit visualisation is not optimized to show the whole "all branches" history, as SourceTree is. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |